Skip to content
MotorFiable

Alfa Romeo 166 vs Rover 75: which is more reliable?

According to the MotorFiable Score, the Alfa Romeo 166 (7.2/10) has fewer serious documented faults than the Rover 75 (6.1/10), mainly because of the faults in the rest of the car (suspension, brakes, electronics…).

How we work

Reliability comparison of the Alfa Romeo 166 and the Rover 75
ItemAlfa Romeo 166Rover 75
SegmentSaloonSaloon
Years1998–20071998–2005
MotorFiable Score7.2 out of 106.1 out of 10
Engine score7.5/107.0/10
Most recommended engine2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet · BuyBMW M47 · With caution
Score for the rest of the car6.9/105.3/10
Suspension7.9 out of 101 faultMedium severity7.3 out of 102 faultsHigh severity
Brakes7.6 out of 101 faultMedium severity7.9 out of 100 faults
Steering8.1 out of 101 faultMedium severity8.2 out of 100 faults
Electrical system9.6 out of 101 faultLow severityNo documented faults
Bodywork and interior8.8 out of 101 faultLow severity4.9 out of 100 faults
Airbags and safety8.6 out of 101 faultMedium severity5.7 out of 101 faultCritical severity

Scores out of 10: the higher, the fewer serious documented faults. How we calculate them

Main faults of the Alfa Romeo 166

Outside the engine

In their engines

All faults of the Alfa Romeo 166

Main faults of the Rover 75

Outside the engine

In their engines

All faults of the Rover 75

Compare other cars · Ranking of the least reliable cars