Skip to content
MotorFiable

The most reliable car brands

Average score of each brand's models with solid evidence (engines, gearbox, suspension, brakes, electronics and the rest of the car), out of 10. Each generation counts as one model, and only brands with at least 3 analysed models are included.

Among the 32 brands with at least 3 models backed by solid evidence, Suzuki and Cupra tie for the best average score (6.7/10); they are followed by Mitsubishi (6.6) and Nissan (6.5). The one with the lowest average score is Citroën (5.2/10). Differences between brands are smaller than between models: within every brand there are very reliable cars and engines, and others best avoided.

How we work

  1. Rank 1
    Suzuki

    7 models analysed

    Best: Suzuki Ignis (7.7) · Worst: Suzuki Swift III (5.9)

    6.7 out of 10Average score
  2. Rank 1
    Cupra

    4 models analysed

    Best: Cupra Formentor (7.0) · Worst: Cupra Born (6.2)

    6.7 out of 10Average score
  3. Rank 3
    Mitsubishi

    4 models analysed

    Best: Mitsubishi Colt VI (8.0) · Worst: Mitsubishi Outlander II (5.8)

    6.6 out of 10Average score
  4. Rank 4
    Nissan

    16 models analysed

    Best: Nissan Leaf II (8.0) · Worst: Nissan NV200 (5.6)

    6.5 out of 10Average score
  5. Rank 4
    Jeep

    6 models analysed

    Best: Jeep Renegade (7.0) · Worst: Jeep Wrangler JL (6.1)

    6.5 out of 10Average score
  6. Rank 6
    Kia

    22 models analysed

    Best: Kia Picanto II (7.3) · Worst: Kia Ceed I (5.0)

    6.4 out of 10Average score
  7. Rank 7
    Hyundai

    22 models analysed

    Best: Hyundai i10 II (7.4) · Worst: Hyundai i30 I (4.9)

    6.3 out of 10Average score
  8. Rank 7
    Mazda

    16 models analysed

    Best: Mazda 2 II (7.3) · Worst: Mazda CX-7 (4.7)

    6.3 out of 10Average score
  9. Rank 7
    Dacia

    12 models analysed

    Best: Dacia Spring (7.3) · Worst: Dacia Lodgy (5.4)

    6.3 out of 10Average score
  10. Rank 10
    Audi

    26 models analysed

    Best: Audi A5 II (7.6) · Worst: Audi A3 II (5.3)

    6.2 out of 10Average score
  11. Rank 10
    Honda

    10 models analysed

    Best: Honda CR-V IV (6.9) · Worst: Honda Civic X (5.6)

    6.2 out of 10Average score
  12. Rank 10
    Lancia

    3 models analysed

    Best: Lancia Thema II (6.7) · Worst: Lancia Ypsilon III (5.8)

    6.2 out of 10Average score
  13. Rank 13
    Škoda

    20 models analysed

    Best: Škoda Citigo (6.9) · Worst: Škoda Yeti (4.4)

    6.1 out of 10Average score
  14. Rank 13
    Subaru

    4 models analysed

    Best: Subaru Outback V (7.3) · Worst: Subaru Forester III (5.1)

    6.1 out of 10Average score
  15. Rank 15
    Renault

    27 models analysed

    Best: Renault Captur II (7.0) · Worst: Renault Zoe (4.8)

    6.0 out of 10Average score
  16. Rank 15
    Toyota

    25 models analysed

    Best: Toyota Corolla XII (6.9) · Worst: Toyota ProAce City (4.8)

    6.0 out of 10Average score
  17. Rank 15
    Alfa Romeo

    7 models analysed

    Best: Alfa Romeo 166 (7.2) · Worst: Alfa Romeo MiTo (5.3)

    6.0 out of 10Average score
  18. Rank 15
    MINI

    7 models analysed

    Best: MINI Cooper F55 (6.9) · Worst: MINI Countryman R60 (4.6)

    6.0 out of 10Average score
  19. Rank 19
    Volkswagen

    35 models analysed

    Best: Volkswagen up! (7.4) · Worst: Volkswagen Touran I (4.8)

    5.9 out of 10Average score
  20. Rank 19
    BMW

    31 models analysed

    Best: BMW X1 F48 (7.1) · Worst: BMW X3 E83 (4.4)

    5.9 out of 10Average score
  21. Rank 19
    Fiat

    17 models analysed

    Best: Fiat Panda II (7.6) · Worst: Fiat Scudo III (3.9)

    5.9 out of 10Average score
  22. Rank 19
    Seat

    15 models analysed

    Best: Seat Mii (7.3) · Worst: Seat Alhambra II (4.7)

    5.9 out of 10Average score
  23. Rank 19
    Chevrolet

    5 models analysed

    Best: Chevrolet Trax (6.5) · Worst: Chevrolet Aveo II (5.0)

    5.9 out of 10Average score
  24. Rank 19
    Porsche

    5 models analysed

    Best: Porsche Macan I (6.7) · Worst: Porsche Cayenne II (5.5)

    5.9 out of 10Average score
  25. Rank 25
    Ford

    26 models analysed

    Best: Ford Mustang Mach-E (6.5) · Worst: Ford Ranger (5.0)

    5.8 out of 10Average score
  26. Rank 25
    Land Rover

    9 models analysed

    Best: Land Rover Discovery 4 (6.5) · Worst: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I (5.4)

    5.8 out of 10Average score
  27. Rank 27
    Mercedes-Benz

    42 models analysed

    Best: Mercedes-Benz CLK C208 (7.0) · Worst: Mercedes-Benz Clase V W447 (3.8)

    5.7 out of 10Average score
  28. Rank 27
    Volvo

    20 models analysed

    Best: Volvo XC70 II (6.7) · Worst: Volvo S40 I (4.5)

    5.7 out of 10Average score
  29. Rank 29
    Opel

    28 models analysed

    Best: Opel Frontera (6.5) · Worst: Opel Crossland (4.3)

    5.6 out of 10Average score
  30. Rank 30
    Peugeot

    27 models analysed

    Best: Peugeot 3008 III (6.8) · Worst: Peugeot 408 (3.3)

    5.4 out of 10Average score
  31. Rank 31
    Jaguar

    3 models analysed

    Best: Jaguar XJ X351 (6.5) · Worst: Jaguar XF X260 (3.6)

    5.3 out of 10Average score
  32. Rank 32
    Citroën

    25 models analysed

    Best: Citroën C3 Aircross II (6.9) · Worst: Citroën C5 X (3.6)

    5.2 out of 10Average score

How it is calculated and what it does not tell you

It is the simple average of the MotorFiable Score of each analysed model of the brand, not weighted by sales. We started with the best-selling models in Spain, so the average depends on which models have been analysed: a brand with few models can rise or fall as others are added. Each car's score comes from its documented, sourced faults, weighting severity and frequency. Full methodology