2.0 TSI / TFSI vs M271: which engine is more reliable?
According to our risk index, the 2.0 TSI / TFSI carries less risk than the M271: 54/100 versus 59/100 (both high risk). The 2.0 TSI / TFSI has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «High oil consumption»; the M271 has 1 documented serious fault, the main one being «Timing chain stretch and wear of the camshaft sprockets».
The index (0–100) weights the severity and frequency of the three most serious documented faults. How it is calculated
Is the 2.0 TSI / TFSI reliable?
It depends above all on the generation. The earliest units (2008-2012, without Valvelift) have more oil consumption complaints and somewhat more chain and tensioner wear; from 2012 the Valvelift design reduced oil consumption but kept carbon build-up on the intake valves as a weak point until, around 2016, supplementary indirect injection was added. The thermostat housing with the integrated water pump leaks coolant in several generations.[1][2][3][4][5]
See the 5 of the 2.0 TSI / TFSI faultsIs the M271 reliable?
The M271 is the four-cylinder petrol engine Mercedes-Benz fitted from 2002 to 2015, first with a mechanical supercharger (Kompressor) and, from 2009, with a turbo in the EVO revision. It has one well-documented weak point across the range: the timing chain and the camshaft sprockets can wear prematurely, a problem a specialist source describes as persistent even after the EVO redesign.[6][7][8]
See the 4 of the M271 faultsSide-by-side comparison
| Item | 2.0 TSI / TFSI | M271 |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | ||
| Type | Engine | Engine |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Displacement | 1,984 cm³ | 1,796 cm³ |
| Timing | Chain | Chain |
| Power | 170–320 hp | 122–204 hp |
| Production | since 2008[1][9] | 2002–2015[7][8] |
| Reliability | ||
| Risk index (what is it?) | 54High risk | 59High risk |
| Documented faults | 5 | 4 |
| Of high or critical severity | 2 | 1 |
| Worst severity | Critical severity | Critical severity |
| Main faults |
|
|
| Most expensive documented repair | up to €4,000High oil consumptionPublished figure[10] | No reliable data |
| Which versions to buy | ||
| BuyRecommended versions | None | |
| With cautionVersions to be cautious about | ||
| AvoidVersions to avoid | None | None |
Severity of each fault: green, low; amber, medium; red, high; dark red, critical. How we rate them
Cars that each one is fitted to
2.0 TSI / TFSI
See the 42 models with the 2.0 TSI / TFSIOther comparisons
With the 2.0 TSI / TFSI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 PureTech
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 PureTech
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 and 1.4 TSI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 TSI / 1.5 TSI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 TCe
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 EcoBoost
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.3 TCe
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 EcoBoost
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Audi 3.0 TFSI V6
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW B38 / B37
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW B48 / B38
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW B58
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW M54
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW N13
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW N20
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW N43/N46
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW N52 / N53
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW N54/N55
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs BMW N62 / N63
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 8v Fire
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4 T-Jet
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 T3 and 1.3 T4 FireFly Turbo
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 0.9 TwinAir and 1.0/1.3 FireFly
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.5 EcoBoost
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.25/1.4/1.6 Ti-VCT
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.8 i-VTEC
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 / 1.5 VTEC Turbo
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 / 2.4 i-VTEC
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Honda e:HEV / i-MMD
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Honda IMA híbrido
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 T-GDI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 GDI / T-GDI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 GDi híbrido (Kappa)
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 / 1.25 MPi
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Smartstream 1.6 T-GDi
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 / 2.4 GDI and T-GDI (Theta II)
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 and 3.0 Ingenium gasolina
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.3 MZR DISI Turbo
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs MZR gasolina
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Skyactiv-G
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs M111
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs M112 / M113
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs M264/M254
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs M260
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs M272/M273
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs M270/M274
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.5 VTi-TECH / T-GDI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs MIVEC gasolina
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Mitsubishi PHEV
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 DIG-T
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.5 VC-Turbo e-Power
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 HR12DE and 1.2 DIG-S (HR12DDR)
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 MR20DE / 2.5 QR25DE
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 16v HR16DE / H4M
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0/1.2/1.4 Ecotec
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4 Turbo
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 and 1.8 Ecotec 16v
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Porsche V8 and V6 (Cayenne and Panamera)
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4 and 1.6 TU3/TU5
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4/1.6 VTi
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 THP
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 and 2.2 16v EW10/EW12
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 0.9 TCe
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 SCe (B4D)
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 TCe / SCe
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4 and 1.6 8v
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 16v
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs E-Tech Híbrido
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 16v F4R and F4RT
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4 and 1.6 16v
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Rover K-Series
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 and 1.4 Boosterjet
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 Dualjet and 1.2 VVT
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.5 K15B (Jimny)
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6 gasolina (serie M)
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 VVT-i
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 Turbo
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.33 Dual VVT-i
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8 VVT-i
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.5 Hybrid
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.6 Dual VVT-i
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.8 Hybrid
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 and 2.4 VVT-i
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 and 2.5 Hybrid
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Volvo 5 cilindros gasolina
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs Drive-E gasolina
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.0 MPI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.2 12V
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.4 16v and 1.6 MPI/FSI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 1.8 T 20v
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs 2.0 FSI
- 2.0 TSI / TFSI vs VW 2.0 TFSI EA113
With the M271
- M271 vs 1.2 PureTech
- M271 vs 1.0 PureTech
- M271 vs 1.2 and 1.4 TSI
- M271 vs 1.0 TSI / 1.5 TSI
- M271 vs 1.2 TCe
- M271 vs 1.0 EcoBoost
- M271 vs 1.3 TCe
- M271 vs 1.6 EcoBoost
- M271 vs Audi 3.0 TFSI V6
- M271 vs BMW B38 / B37
- M271 vs BMW B48 / B38
- M271 vs BMW B58
- M271 vs BMW M54
- M271 vs BMW N13
- M271 vs BMW N20
- M271 vs BMW N43/N46
- M271 vs BMW N52 / N53
- M271 vs BMW N54/N55
- M271 vs BMW N62 / N63
- M271 vs 1.2 8v Fire
- M271 vs 1.4 T-Jet
- M271 vs 1.0 T3 and 1.3 T4 FireFly Turbo
- M271 vs 0.9 TwinAir and 1.0/1.3 FireFly
- M271 vs 1.5 EcoBoost
- M271 vs 1.25/1.4/1.6 Ti-VCT
- M271 vs 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.8 i-VTEC
- M271 vs 1.0 / 1.5 VTEC Turbo
- M271 vs 2.0 / 2.4 i-VTEC
- M271 vs Honda e:HEV / i-MMD
- M271 vs Honda IMA híbrido
- M271 vs 1.0 T-GDI
- M271 vs 1.6 GDI / T-GDI
- M271 vs 1.6 GDi híbrido (Kappa)
- M271 vs 1.0 / 1.25 MPi
- M271 vs Smartstream 1.6 T-GDi
- M271 vs 2.0 / 2.4 GDI and T-GDI (Theta II)
- M271 vs 2.0 and 3.0 Ingenium gasolina
- M271 vs 2.3 MZR DISI Turbo
- M271 vs MZR gasolina
- M271 vs Skyactiv-G
- M271 vs M111
- M271 vs M112 / M113
- M271 vs M264/M254
- M271 vs M260
- M271 vs M272/M273
- M271 vs M270/M274
- M271 vs 1.5 VTi-TECH / T-GDI
- M271 vs MIVEC gasolina
- M271 vs Mitsubishi PHEV
- M271 vs 1.6 DIG-T
- M271 vs 1.5 VC-Turbo e-Power
- M271 vs 1.2 HR12DE and 1.2 DIG-S (HR12DDR)
- M271 vs 2.0 MR20DE / 2.5 QR25DE
- M271 vs 1.6 16v HR16DE / H4M
- M271 vs 1.0/1.2/1.4 Ecotec
- M271 vs 1.4 Turbo
- M271 vs 1.6 and 1.8 Ecotec 16v
- M271 vs Porsche V8 and V6 (Cayenne and Panamera)
- M271 vs 1.4 and 1.6 TU3/TU5
- M271 vs 1.4/1.6 VTi
- M271 vs 1.6 THP
- M271 vs 2.0 and 2.2 16v EW10/EW12
- M271 vs 0.9 TCe
- M271 vs 1.0 SCe (B4D)
- M271 vs 1.0 TCe / SCe
- M271 vs 1.4 and 1.6 8v
- M271 vs 1.2 16v
- M271 vs E-Tech Híbrido
- M271 vs 2.0 16v F4R and F4RT
- M271 vs 1.4 and 1.6 16v
- M271 vs Rover K-Series
- M271 vs 1.0 and 1.4 Boosterjet
- M271 vs 1.2 Dualjet and 1.2 VVT
- M271 vs 1.5 K15B (Jimny)
- M271 vs 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6 gasolina (serie M)
- M271 vs 1.0 VVT-i
- M271 vs 1.2 Turbo
- M271 vs 1.33 Dual VVT-i
- M271 vs 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8 VVT-i
- M271 vs 1.5 Hybrid
- M271 vs 1.6 Dual VVT-i
- M271 vs 1.8 Hybrid
- M271 vs 2.0 and 2.4 VVT-i
- M271 vs 2.0 and 2.5 Hybrid
- M271 vs Volvo 5 cilindros gasolina
- M271 vs Drive-E gasolina
- M271 vs 1.0 MPI
- M271 vs 1.2 12V
- M271 vs 1.4 16v and 1.6 MPI/FSI
- M271 vs 1.8 T 20v
- M271 vs 2.0 FSI
- M271 vs VW 2.0 TFSI EA113
Compare other engines
Sources
Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.
- Volkswagen EA888 engineWikipedia (inglés) · Other source · consulted 26 September 2026
- Fiabilité Volkswagen (datos de propietarios por modelo)fiches-auto.fr · Reliability study · consulted 26 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité Audi (datos de propietarios por modelo)fiches-auto.fr · Reliability study · consulted 26 September 2026 · in French
- Motores TFSI: características, ventajas e inconvenientesAutofácil · Motoring press · published 18 May 2020 · consulted 26 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Motor 2.0 TFSI 190 CV (ficha técnica)km77 · Technical documentation · published 13 May 2015 · consulted 26 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Mercedes M271: Typische Probleme und HaltbarkeitGebrauchtwagenberater · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Mercedes-Benz M271 engineWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Mercedes-Benz M 271Wikipedia (alemán) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Audi TTWikipedia (inglés) · Other source · consulted 26 September 2026
- Tu coche quema aceite: 6 señales de alarma y la solución definitiva para salvar tu motorAutopista.es · Motoring press · published 19 June 2026 · consulted 26 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Témoignages fiabilité Audifiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 26 September 2026 · in French
- Témoignages fiabilité Volkswagenfiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 26 September 2026 · in French