1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue: which engine is more reliable?
According to our risk index, the 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD carries less risk than the 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue: 48/100 (moderate risk) versus 59/100 (high risk). The 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «Intake manifold flap failure (swirl effect)»; the 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «Degradation of the wet timing belt (2.0 EcoBlue)».
The index (0–100) weights the severity and frequency of the three most serious documented faults. How it is calculated
Is the 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD reliable?
The 1.9 JTD/Multijet (8v and 16v) and the five-cylinder 2.4 JTD were the world's first common rail diesels and have a reputation for robust, long-lived mechanicals. Before buying, check the known faults: the intake manifold flaps and the EGR valve fail or clog with urban use, the turbo and dual-mass flywheel wear with mileage, and the particulate filter on versions that have one clogs if there are not enough long journeys.[1][2][3][4]
See the 6 of the 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD faultsIs the 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue reliable?
EcoBlue has been Ford's diesel family since 2016, with two very different engines despite the shared name: the 2.0 (codenamed «Panther») debuted a wet timing belt (belt-in-oil) and a second wet belt for the oil pump, the same type of design that has caused problems on other Ford engines; the 1.5, by contrast, uses a conventional dry belt. The 2.0 powers vans, SUVs and large saloons; the 1.5 the smaller models.[5][6]
See the 3 of the 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue faultsSide-by-side comparison
| Item | 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD | 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | ||
| Type | Engine | Engine |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Displacement | — | — |
| Timing | Timing belt (dry) | Wet belt (belt-in-oil) |
| Power | 78–210 hp | 85–213 hp |
| Production | 1997–2012[1][7][8] | since 2016[5][9] |
| Reliability | ||
| Risk index (what is it?) | 48Moderate risk | 59High risk |
| Documented faults | 6 | 3 |
| Of high or critical severity | 2 | 2 |
| Worst severity | High severity | Critical severity |
| Main faults |
|
|
| Most expensive documented repair | up to €1,900Dual-mass flywheel wear on manual gearbox versionsPublished figure[10] | No reliable data |
| Which versions to buy | ||
| BuyRecommended versions | None |
|
| With cautionVersions to be cautious about | ||
| AvoidVersions to avoid | None | None |
Severity of each fault: green, low; amber, medium; red, high; dark red, critical. How we rate them
Cars that each one is fitted to
Other comparisons
With the 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.6 HDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 TDI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.5 dCi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs BMW N47
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.3 Multijet
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs OM651
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.6 CRDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.6 dCi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.6 TDI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 HDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs BMW B47
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs BMW B57
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs BMW M47
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs BMW M57
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs BMW N57
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.3 MultiJet
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.8 TDCi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 i-CTDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.7 CRDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs TDV6 / SDV6
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs MZR-CD
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs Skyactiv-D
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs OM642
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs OM654
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs OM656
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.8/2.2 DI-D
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.6 CDTI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.7 CDTI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 CDTI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.4 HDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 HDi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.9 dCi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0 dCi
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.4 D-4D
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs D4/D5
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs D5 5 cilindros
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.2 TDI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.4 TDI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 1.9 TDI
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 2.5 TDI R5
- 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD vs 3.0 TDI V6
With the 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.6 HDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 TDI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.5 dCi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs BMW N47
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.3 Multijet
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs OM651
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.6 CRDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.6 dCi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.6 TDI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 HDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs BMW B47
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs BMW B57
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs BMW M47
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs BMW M57
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs BMW N57
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.3 MultiJet
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.8 TDCi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 i-CTDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.7 CRDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs TDV6 / SDV6
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs MZR-CD
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs Skyactiv-D
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs OM642
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs OM654
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs OM656
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.8/2.2 DI-D
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.6 CDTI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.7 CDTI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 CDTI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.4 HDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 HDi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.9 dCi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0 dCi
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.4 D-4D
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs D4/D5
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs D5 5 cilindros
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.2 TDI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.4 TDI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 1.9 TDI
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 2.5 TDI R5
- 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue vs 3.0 TDI V6
Compare other engines
Sources
Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.
- Fiat JTD engineWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Opel Vectra C (2002-2008) – Typische Probleme & SchwachstellenGebrauchtwagenberater · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Opel Zafira B (2005-2014) – Typische Probleme & SchwachstellenGebrauchtwagenberater · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Alfa Romeo GT: problemas, fallos y averías más frecuentesTotalrenting · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Ford EcoBlue engineWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Which Cars Have a Wet Belt? Full UK Engine List (2026)CarOkay · Other source · published 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026
- Saab 9-3Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Fiat CromaWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Nuevo motor Ford 2.0 EcoBlue Diésel: más potente y ahorradorAutopista.es · Motoring press · published April 2016 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Opel Zafira 2 : les plus et les moinsFiches-auto.fr · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Alfa Romeo 156 : les plus et les moinsFiches-auto.fr · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Alfa Romeo 147 : les plus et les moinsFiches-auto.fr · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Alfa Romeo 159 : les plus et les moinsFiches-auto.fr · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Todos los coches afectados ya por problemas de motor a causa de correas de distribución en aceiteAutopista.es · Motoring press · published February 2025 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish