Skip to content
MotorFiable

Mazda 3 I vs Volvo V50: which is more reliable?

According to the MotorFiable Score, the Mazda 3 I (6.0/10) has fewer serious documented faults than the Volvo V50 (5.6/10), mainly because of the faults in the rest of the car (suspension, brakes, electronics…).

How we work

Reliability comparison of the Mazda 3 I and the Volvo V50
ItemMazda 3 IVolvo V50
SegmentCompactCompact
Years2003–20092004–2012
MotorFiable Score6.0 out of 105.6 out of 10
Engine score4.6/104.7/10
Most recommended engineMZR gasolina · BuyVolvo 5 cilindros gasolina · With caution
Score for the rest of the car7.5/106.5/10
Suspension7.9 out of 101 faultMedium severity6.0 out of 100 faults
Brakes8.8 out of 100 faults8.0 out of 101 faultHigh severity
Steering8.8 out of 101 faultMedium severity8.6 out of 100 faults
Gearbox and clutchNo documented faults6.8 out of 103 faultsHigh severity
Electrical system8.6 out of 101 faultMedium severity7.9 out of 101 faultHigh severity
Electronics and infotainment9.6 out of 101 faultLow severityNo documented faults
Bodywork and interior7.3 out of 102 faultsMedium severity8.7 out of 101 faultMedium severity
Airbags and safety8.9 out of 101 faultHigh severityNo documented faults

Scores out of 10: the higher, the fewer serious documented faults. How we calculate them

Main faults of the Mazda 3 I

Outside the engine

In their engines

All faults of the Mazda 3 I

Main faults of the Volvo V50

Outside the engine

In their engines

All faults of the Volvo V50

Compare other cars · Ranking of the least reliable cars