Skip to content
MotorFiable

Peugeot Rifter vs Toyota ProAce II: which is more reliable?

According to the MotorFiable Score, the Toyota ProAce II (6.0/10) has fewer serious documented faults than the Peugeot Rifter (4.8/10), mainly because of their engines.

How we work

Reliability comparison of the Peugeot Rifter and the Toyota ProAce II
ItemPeugeot RifterToyota ProAce II
SegmentVan and combiVan and combi
Years2018–today2016–today
MotorFiable Score4.8 out of 106.0 out of 10
Engine score3.7/106.5/10
Most recommended engine1.5 BlueHDi · Buy2.0 HDi · With caution
Score for the rest of the car5.9/105.6/10
Suspension8.6 out of 100 faults6.7 out of 102 faultsCritical severity
Brakes8.5 out of 101 faultHigh severity7.8 out of 101 faultCritical severity
Steering7.7 out of 102 faultsHigh severity8.2 out of 101 faultCritical severity
Electronics and infotainmentNo documented faults7.9 out of 101 faultHigh severity
Climate control7.1 out of 101 faultCritical severity8.6 out of 101 faultMedium severity
Bodywork and interior7.9 out of 101 faultHigh severity6.0 out of 100 faults
Airbags and safety7.1 out of 101 faultCritical severityNo documented faults

Scores out of 10: the higher, the fewer serious documented faults. How we calculate them

Main faults of the Peugeot Rifter

Outside the engine

In their engines

All faults of the Peugeot Rifter

Main faults of the Toyota ProAce II

Outside the engine

In their engines

All faults of the Toyota ProAce II

Compare other cars · Ranking of the least reliable cars