2.0 HDi vs 2.2 i-CTDi: which engine is more reliable?
According to our risk index, the 2.2 i-CTDi carries less risk than the 2.0 HDi: 52/100 versus 55/100 (both high risk). The 2.0 HDi has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «Variable-geometry turbo failures (actuator, sensors and clogging)»; the 2.2 i-CTDi has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «Turbocharger failure».
The index (0–100) weights the severity and frequency of the three most serious documented faults. How it is calculated
Is the 2.0 HDi reliable?
It is a robust diesel in its simplest 90 hp version, but the 136 to 140 hp generation with a DPF (2004-2011) concentrates the engine's problems: turbo, DPF, EGR and, above all, a dual-mass flywheel that fails very often. The BlueHDi engines (from 2013) are mechanically more reliable, but add an AdBlue tank that can crystallise; the OCU (Spanish consumer organisation) has reported this fault in Spain and Stellantis covers it with a compensation programme.[1][2][3][4]
See the 5 of the 2.0 HDi faultsIs the 2.2 i-CTDi reliable?
The 2.2 i-CTDi is the diesel Honda fitted to the Civic, Accord, CR-V and FR-V in Europe between 2003 and 2011, before the i-DTEC. It uses a timing chain and common-rail injection, an architecture that generally ages well. The best-documented faults are wear of the dual-mass flywheel and clutch, and cracks in the exhaust manifold; there are also cases involving the turbo, EGR and injectors.[5][6][7][8]
See the 5 of the 2.2 i-CTDi faultsSide-by-side comparison
| Item | 2.0 HDi | 2.2 i-CTDi |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | ||
| Type | Engine | Engine |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Displacement | 1,997 cm³ | 2,204 cm³ |
| Timing | Timing belt (dry) | Chain |
| Power | 90–180 hp | 140 hp |
| Production | 1999–2021[1][9][10][11][12] | 2003–2011[5][7][13] |
| Reliability | ||
| Risk index (what is it?) | 55High risk | 52High risk |
| Documented faults | 5 | 5 |
| Of high or critical severity | 2 | 2 |
| Worst severity | High severity | High severity |
| Main faults |
|
|
| Most expensive documented repair | up to €1,200AdBlue tank crystallisation and failures (BlueHDi)Published figure[3][4][14] | No reliable data |
| Which versions to buy | ||
| BuyRecommended versions | None | |
| With cautionVersions to be cautious about | ||
| AvoidVersions to avoid | None | None |
Severity of each fault: green, low; amber, medium; red, high; dark red, critical. How we rate them
Cars that each one is fitted to
Other comparisons
With the 2.0 HDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.6 HDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 TDI
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.5 dCi
- 2.0 HDi vs BMW N47
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.3 Multijet
- 2.0 HDi vs OM651
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.6 CRDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.6 dCi
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.6 TDI
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- 2.0 HDi vs BMW B47
- 2.0 HDi vs BMW B57
- 2.0 HDi vs BMW M47
- 2.0 HDi vs BMW M57
- 2.0 HDi vs BMW N57
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.3 MultiJet
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.8 TDCi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.7 CRDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- 2.0 HDi vs TDV6 / SDV6
- 2.0 HDi vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- 2.0 HDi vs MZR-CD
- 2.0 HDi vs Skyactiv-D
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- 2.0 HDi vs OM642
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- 2.0 HDi vs OM654
- 2.0 HDi vs OM656
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.8/2.2 DI-D
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.6 CDTI
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.7 CDTI
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 CDTI
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.4 HDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2 HDi
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.9 dCi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0 dCi
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.4 D-4D
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- 2.0 HDi vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- 2.0 HDi vs D4/D5
- 2.0 HDi vs D5 5 cilindros
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.2 TDI
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.4 TDI
- 2.0 HDi vs 1.9 TDI
- 2.0 HDi vs 2.5 TDI R5
- 2.0 HDi vs 3.0 TDI V6
With the 2.2 i-CTDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.6 HDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 TDI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.5 dCi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs BMW N47
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.3 Multijet
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs OM651
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.6 CRDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.6 dCi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.6 TDI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs BMW B47
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs BMW B57
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs BMW M47
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs BMW M57
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs BMW N57
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.3 MultiJet
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.8 TDCi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.7 CRDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs TDV6 / SDV6
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs MZR-CD
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs Skyactiv-D
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs OM642
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs OM654
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs OM656
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.8/2.2 DI-D
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.6 CDTI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.7 CDTI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 CDTI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.4 HDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2 HDi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.9 dCi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0 dCi
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.4 D-4D
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs D4/D5
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs D5 5 cilindros
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.2 TDI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.4 TDI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 1.9 TDI
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 2.5 TDI R5
- 2.2 i-CTDi vs 3.0 TDI V6
Compare other engines
Sources
Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.
- Fiabilité du 2.0 HDIFiches-Auto · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- AdBlue : problèmes en pagailleFiches-Auto · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Más problemas para Stellantis: ahora tendrá que indemnizar también a los afectados por el AdBlueAutopista · Motoring press · published 30 December 2024 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- El fallo que afecta a cientos de coches y que ahora la OCU denuncia para reclamar indemnizacionesAutopista · Motoring press · published 29 May 2023 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Honda N engineWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Fiabilité et pannes Honda Civic (2006-2011)Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Avis et fiabilité Honda Accord (2003-2008)Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité et pannes Honda CR-V (2007-2013)Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- PSA EW/DW engineWikipedia (inglés) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Peugeot 307Wikipedia (español) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Peugeot 3008Wikipedia (español) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Citroën C4 PicassoWikipedia (español) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Honda Civic (eighth generation)Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Aditivo AdBlue: qué debes usar para evitar una reparación de 2.000 euros en tu coche diéselAutopista · Motoring press · published 1 April 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Honda Civic 8 – Alle bekannten Probleme & KrankheitenGebrauchtwagenberater.de · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German