EAT6/EAT8 vs PowerShift: which gearbox is more reliable?
According to our risk index, the EAT6/EAT8 gearbox carries less risk than the PowerShift gearbox: 38/100 (moderate risk) versus 72/100 (high risk). The EAT6/EAT8 gearbox has 1 documented serious fault, the main one being «Valve body failure leading to immobilisation or gearbox replacement»; the PowerShift gearbox has 3 documented serious faults, the main one being «Juddering, hesitation and slipping of the dry clutch (DPS6)».
The index (0–100) weights the severity and frequency of the three most serious documented faults. How it is calculated
Is the EAT6/EAT8 gearbox reliable?
The EAT6 and EAT8 gearboxes, made by Aisin for PSA/Stellantis, are torque-converter automatics fitted to Peugeot, Citroën, DS and Opel models since 2014. Their most-cited weak point is the valve body: pressure or calibration faults cause jerking and hesitation, sometimes fixable with software, and in isolated cases failures that force a gearbox replacement. The manufacturer advertises the fluid as "lifetime", but several specialists recommend changing the oil every 60,000-80,000 km.[1][2][3][4]
See the 3 of the EAT6/EAT8 gearbox faultsIs the PowerShift gearbox reliable?
Ford PowerShift covers two different dual-clutch gearboxes: the dry-clutch DPS6, fitted to the Fiesta, Focus, B-MAX, EcoSport and C-MAX; and the oil-bath 6DCT450, fitted to higher-torque diesels in the Focus, Kuga, Mondeo, S-MAX and Galaxy. The DPS6 has racked up thousands of complaints about juddering and slipping, with a US court settlement in 2020; the 6DCT450 is more robust, but needs its oil changed every 50,000-60,000 km to avoid wearing out the clutch.[5][6][7]
See the 4 of the PowerShift gearbox faultsSide-by-side comparison
| Item | EAT6/EAT8 | PowerShift |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | ||
| Type | Gearbox | Gearbox |
| Gearbox type | Torque-converter automatic with epicyclic gear sets, 6 or 8 speeds depending on version (EAT6/EAT8) | Dual-clutch, 6-speed: dry DPS6/6DCT250 (around 250 Nm) or oil-bath 6DCT450 (up to about 450 Nm), depending on version |
| Production | since 2014[1][8][9] | 2010–2023[5][6][10] |
| Reliability | ||
| Risk index (what is it?) | 38Moderate risk | 72High risk |
| Documented faults | 3 | 4 |
| Of high or critical severity | 1 | 3 |
| Worst severity | High severity | High severity |
| Main faults | ||
| Most expensive documented repair | up to €9,000Valve body failure leading to immobilisation or gearbox replacementPublished figure[2][11][12] | up to €2,800Accelerated wear of the wet clutch in the 6DCT450Published figure[13] |
| Which versions to buy | ||
| BuyRecommended versions | None | None |
| With cautionVersions to be cautious about | ||
| AvoidVersions to avoid | None | None |
Severity of each fault: green, low; amber, medium; red, high; dark red, critical. How we rate them
Cars that each one is fitted to
Other comparisons
With the EAT6/EAT8 gearbox
- EAT6/EAT8 vs DSG7 DQ200
- EAT6/EAT8 vs Multitronic
- EAT6/EAT8 vs DSG6 DQ250
- EAT6/EAT8 vs EDC
- EAT6/EAT8 vs Dualogic
- EAT6/EAT8 vs 7DCT
- EAT6/EAT8 vs 7G-DCT
- EAT6/EAT8 vs 7G-Tronic / 9G-Tronic
- EAT6/EAT8 vs CVT Xtronic
- EAT6/EAT8 vs AL4 / DP0
- EAT6/EAT8 vs 09G (Aisin)
- EAT6/EAT8 vs DSG7 DQ381/DQ500
- EAT6/EAT8 vs ZF 6HP
- EAT6/EAT8 vs ZF 8HP
With the PowerShift gearbox
- PowerShift vs DSG7 DQ200
- PowerShift vs Multitronic
- PowerShift vs DSG6 DQ250
- PowerShift vs EDC
- PowerShift vs Dualogic
- PowerShift vs 7DCT
- PowerShift vs 7G-DCT
- PowerShift vs 7G-Tronic / 9G-Tronic
- PowerShift vs CVT Xtronic
- PowerShift vs AL4 / DP0
- PowerShift vs 09G (Aisin)
- PowerShift vs DSG7 DQ381/DQ500
- PowerShift vs ZF 6HP
- PowerShift vs ZF 8HP
Compare other engines
Sources
Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.
- Boîte auto EAT8 Peugeot / CitroënFiches-auto.fr · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité Peugeot 508 2 (2018), pannes et témoignagesFiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité Opel Grandland X (2017-2024), pannes et témoignagesFiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité Peugeot 2008 2 (2020), pannes et témoignagesFiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Ford Focus (third generation)Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Ford Fiesta (sixth generation)Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Ford Mondeo MK5 (2014-2022): Typische Probleme & Rückrufegebrauchtwagenberater.de · Other source · published 9 August 2025 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Peugeot 308 IIWikipédia (fr) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Peugeot 3008 IIWikipédia (fr) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- GetragWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- El cambio de aceite de la caja de cambios que evita una avería de 2.000 eurosMotor16 · Motoring press · published 24 September 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- El mantenimiento de la caja de cambios que evita una avería de más de 2.000 eurosMotor16 · Motoring press · published 21 September 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Ford Kuga (Mk2, 2012-2019): Typische Probleme & Rückrufegebrauchtwagenberater.de · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Fiabilité Peugeot 308 (2013-2021), pannes et témoignagesFiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité Peugeot 5008 2 (2017-2024), pannes et témoignagesFiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Used Ford Fiesta (Mk7, 2017-2023) buyers guide: a solid second-hand superminiAuto Express · Motoring press · published 26 June 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026
- Ford S-Max: Typische Probleme & Rückrufegebrauchtwagenberater.de · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German