Skip to content
MotorFiable

2.0 EcoBlue twin-turbo 213 (Ranger and high-demand applications, since ~2019) engine: faults and reliability

Ford 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue (Panther) version

With caution

We have not found a source clarifying whether this twin-turbo variant shares exactly the same wet belt design as the single-turbo version; if in doubt, apply the same precautions.[1]

Years
since 2019
Power
213 hp
Faults that affect it
3
2 of high or critical severity
Cars that use it
3
in our database

4 sourcesHow we work

What changes in this version

The higher-power, higher-torque variant of the 2.0 EcoBlue, with two turbochargers in series; Ford reserves it for more demanding applications such as the Ranger, and it is also offered in the Galaxy and the S-Max.[2][3][4]

Faults of the 2.0 EcoBlue twin-turbo 213 (Ranger and high-demand applications, since ~2019) engine

The documented engine faults that affect this version and its years, from most to least important.

  1. 1Critical severityFrequency: CommonTimingDegradation of the wet timing belt (2.0 EcoBlue)Yes: the 2.0 EcoBlue debuted a timing belt that runs bathed in oil on Ford's diesels. Over the years it can degrade and shed debris that affects the lubrication circuit, with a risk of seizure. A roundup by Autopista.es places it in the Focus, Kuga, Transit and Transit/Tourneo Custom.
  2. 2Critical severityFrequency: OccasionalLubricationWet oil pump belt (2.0 EcoBlue)In addition to the timing belt, the 2.0 EcoBlue drives the oil pump with a second belt that also runs bathed in oil. If it degrades or breaks, the engine suddenly loses lubrication pressure, with the same risk of seizure as the timing belt.
  3. 3Medium severityFrequency: RareEmissions controlEmissions system warnings (AdBlue/EGR) and injector wearOn the Ford Focus IV and Kuga III, generations that now only use EcoBlue, some owners report, occasionally (not in the majority), AdBlue system warnings or injector failures. It is a small sample, and we have not found that Ford has announced a campaign of its own for the EcoBlue for this reason.

Cars fitted with the 2.0 EcoBlue twin-turbo 213 (Ranger and high-demand applications, since ~2019) engine

Open each car to see all its faults with this engine and what to check before buying it.

Ford

Frequently asked questions

Is the 2.0 EcoBlue twin-turbo 213 (Ranger and high-demand applications, since ~2019) engine reliable?

Our verdict is “With caution”. We have not found a source clarifying whether this twin-turbo variant shares exactly the same wet belt design as the single-turbo version; if in doubt, apply the same precautions.[1]

What faults does the 2.0 EcoBlue twin-turbo 213 (Ranger and high-demand applications, since ~2019) engine have?

The documented ones that affect this version, by importance: degradation of the wet timing belt (2.0 EcoBlue) (critical severity), wet oil pump belt (2.0 EcoBlue) (critical severity) and emissions system warnings (AdBlue/EGR) and injector wear (medium severity).

Which cars use the 2.0 EcoBlue twin-turbo 213 (Ranger and high-demand applications, since ~2019) engine?

Ford Galaxy III (2019–2023), Ford S-Max II (2019–2023) and Ford Ranger (since 2019).[1][2][3][4]

Are you buying a car with the 2.0 EcoBlue twin-turbo 213 (Ranger and high-demand applications, since ~2019) engine?

We will put you in touch with a partner only if you authorise it in the form.

Do you have a car with this engine? Tell us which faults you have had and at how many kilometres. Report your fault.

Sources

Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.

  1. Which Cars Have a Wet Belt? Full UK Engine List (2026)CarOkay · Other source · published 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026
  2. Ford EcoBlue engineWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
  3. Ford GalaxyWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
  4. Ford S-MaxWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026