1.6 CDTI vs D4/D5: which engine is more reliable?
According to our risk index, the 1.6 CDTI carries less risk than the D4/D5: 36/100 (moderate risk) versus 64/100 (high risk). The 1.6 CDTI has 1 documented serious fault, the main one being «Noise and early wear of the timing chain and its tensioner»; the D4/D5 has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «Auxiliary belt breakage that takes the timing belt with it (5-cylinder)».
The index (0–100) weights the severity and frequency of the three most serious documented faults. How it is calculated
Is the 1.6 CDTI reliable?
The Opel/Vauxhall 1.6 CDTI (2013-2020, 95-160 hp) has no design fault acknowledged by the manufacturer, but it has built up reports of early wear of the timing chain and its tensioner, two episodes (2016 and 2018) of German investigation into a possible EGR valve shut-off, and AdBlue system faults on its Euro 6 versions.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
See the 3 of the 1.6 CDTI faultsIs the D4/D5 reliable?
The Volvo D5/D4 covers two different engines: the classic 5-cylinder (2001-2016, D5244T/D5204) and the 4-cylinder VEA (D4204T, from 2013). On the former, several owners document the auxiliary belt breaking and taking the timing belt with it, destroying the engine; on the VEA the most common problems are the EGR, the DPF and oil consumption that can damage the turbo from 90,000-150,000 km. Neither is an engine to buy without checking its service history.[8][9][10][11]
See the 6 of the D4/D5 faultsSide-by-side comparison
| Item | 1.6 CDTI | D4/D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | ||
| Type | Engine | Engine |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Displacement | 1,598 cm³ | — |
| Timing | Chain | Timing belt (dry) |
| Power | 95–160 hp | 120–235 hp |
| Production | 2013–2020[1][12] | 2001–2024[8][9][13] |
| Reliability | ||
| Risk index (what is it?) | 36Moderate risk | 64High risk |
| Documented faults | 3 | 6 |
| Of high or critical severity | 1 | 2 |
| Worst severity | High severity | Critical severity |
| Main faults |
|
|
| Most expensive documented repair | up to €2,000AdBlue (SCR) system failure on Euro 6 versionsPublished figure[7][14] | No reliable data |
| Which versions to buy | ||
| BuyRecommended versions | None | None |
| With cautionVersions to be cautious about | ||
| AvoidVersions to avoid | None | None |
Severity of each fault: green, low; amber, medium; red, high; dark red, critical. How we rate them
Cars that each one is fitted to
Other comparisons
With the 1.6 CDTI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.6 HDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 TDI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.5 dCi
- 1.6 CDTI vs BMW N47
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.3 Multijet
- 1.6 CDTI vs OM651
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.6 CRDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.6 dCi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.6 TDI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 HDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- 1.6 CDTI vs BMW B47
- 1.6 CDTI vs BMW B57
- 1.6 CDTI vs BMW M47
- 1.6 CDTI vs BMW M57
- 1.6 CDTI vs BMW N57
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.3 MultiJet
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.8 TDCi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 i-CTDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.7 CRDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- 1.6 CDTI vs TDV6 / SDV6
- 1.6 CDTI vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- 1.6 CDTI vs MZR-CD
- 1.6 CDTI vs Skyactiv-D
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- 1.6 CDTI vs OM642
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- 1.6 CDTI vs OM654
- 1.6 CDTI vs OM656
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.8/2.2 DI-D
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.7 CDTI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 CDTI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.4 HDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 HDi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.9 dCi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0 dCi
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.4 D-4D
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- 1.6 CDTI vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- 1.6 CDTI vs D5 5 cilindros
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.2 TDI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.4 TDI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 1.9 TDI
- 1.6 CDTI vs 2.5 TDI R5
- 1.6 CDTI vs 3.0 TDI V6
With the D4/D5
- D4/D5 vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 1.5 dCi
- D4/D5 vs BMW N47
- D4/D5 vs 1.3 Multijet
- D4/D5 vs OM651
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- D4/D5 vs BMW B47
- D4/D5 vs BMW B57
- D4/D5 vs BMW M47
- D4/D5 vs BMW M57
- D4/D5 vs BMW N57
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- D4/D5 vs 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD
- D4/D5 vs 2.3 MultiJet
- D4/D5 vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- D4/D5 vs 1.8 TDCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- D4/D5 vs 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 i-CTDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- D4/D5 vs 1.7 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- D4/D5 vs TDV6 / SDV6
- D4/D5 vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- D4/D5 vs MZR-CD
- D4/D5 vs Skyactiv-D
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- D4/D5 vs OM642
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- D4/D5 vs OM654
- D4/D5 vs OM656
- D4/D5 vs 1.8/2.2 DI-D
- D4/D5 vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- D4/D5 vs 1.7 CDTI
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 CDTI
- D4/D5 vs 1.4 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.9 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- D4/D5 vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- D4/D5 vs 1.4 D-4D
- D4/D5 vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- D4/D5 vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- D4/D5 vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- D4/D5 vs D5 5 cilindros
- D4/D5 vs 1.2 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 1.4 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 1.9 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 2.5 TDI R5
- D4/D5 vs 3.0 TDI V6
Compare other engines
Sources
Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.
- GM Medium Diesel engineWikipedia (inglés) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Opel, acusada de desconectar la válvula EGR de su modelo Zafira ¿aumentando las emisiones de NOx?Motorpasión · Motoring press · published 19 May 2016 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Opel está de nuevo en el punto de mira por las emisiones con 60.000 coches afectadosMotorpasión · Motoring press · published 16 July 2018 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- La Fiscalía alemana registra las instalaciones de Opel en el marco de una investigación sobre emisionesMotorpasión · Motoring press · published 15 October 2018 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Fiabilité Opel Astra 5 (K) - avis et pannes des propriétairesFiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité Opel Mokka X - avis et pannes des propriétairesFiches-auto.fr · Owners' forum · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- El aditivo de AdBlue que debes usar para evitar una reparación de 2.000 euros en tu coche diéselAutopista.es · Motoring press · published 1 April 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Volvo Engine ArchitectureWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Volvo D5: 185 CV para el S60, V70, XC70 y XC90Autopista.es · Motoring press · published July 2005 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo XC60 (2008-2017)Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo V60Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Opel Astra KWikipedia (alemán) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Volvo XC90Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Twin dosing en diésel: el fallo que dispara una avería de más de 1.000 euros en el tallerMotor16 · Motoring press · published 22 September 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo S60Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo XC60 (2017-)Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French