1.8/2.2 DI-D vs D4/D5: which engine is more reliable?
According to our risk index, the 1.8/2.2 DI-D carries less risk than the D4/D5: 46/100 (moderate risk) versus 64/100 (high risk). The 1.8/2.2 DI-D has 3 documented serious faults, the main one being «Clogged particulate filter and oil dilution»; the D4/D5 has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «Auxiliary belt breakage that takes the timing belt with it (5-cylinder)».
The index (0–100) weights the severity and frequency of the three most serious documented faults. How it is calculated
Is the 1.8/2.2 DI-D reliable?
Yes, in general: Mitsubishi's own 1.8 DI-D (4N13) and 2.2 DI-D (4N14) diesels have a reputation for reliability compared with the Volkswagen and PSA engines they replaced in 2010. Their best-documented fault is a clogged particulate filter with oil dilution on short journeys, along with occasional cases of injector, turbo and balance shaft problems. Do not confuse them with the PSA 2.2 HDi that the Outlander used earlier, shared with the C-Crosser and the Peugeot 4007.[1][2][3][4]
See the 4 of the 1.8/2.2 DI-D faultsIs the D4/D5 reliable?
The Volvo D5/D4 covers two different engines: the classic 5-cylinder (2001-2016, D5244T/D5204) and the 4-cylinder VEA (D4204T, from 2013). On the former, several owners document the auxiliary belt breaking and taking the timing belt with it, destroying the engine; on the VEA the most common problems are the EGR, the DPF and oil consumption that can damage the turbo from 90,000-150,000 km. Neither is an engine to buy without checking its service history.[5][6][7][8]
See the 6 of the D4/D5 faultsSide-by-side comparison
| Item | 1.8/2.2 DI-D | D4/D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | ||
| Type | Engine | Engine |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Displacement | — | — |
| Timing | Chain | Timing belt (dry) |
| Power | 116–177 hp | 120–235 hp |
| Production | since 2010[1][9][10][11] | 2001–2024[5][6][12] |
| Reliability | ||
| Risk index (what is it?) | 46Moderate risk | 64High risk |
| Documented faults | 4 | 6 |
| Of high or critical severity | 3 | 2 |
| Worst severity | High severity | Critical severity |
| Main faults |
|
|
| Most expensive documented repair | No reliable data | No reliable data |
| Which versions to buy | ||
| BuyRecommended versions | None | None |
| With cautionVersions to be cautious about | ||
| AvoidVersions to avoid | None | None |
Severity of each fault: green, low; amber, medium; red, high; dark red, critical. How we rate them
Cars that each one is fitted to
Other comparisons
With the 1.8/2.2 DI-D
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.6 HDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 TDI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.5 dCi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs BMW N47
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.3 Multijet
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs OM651
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.6 CRDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.6 dCi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.6 TDI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 HDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs BMW B47
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs BMW B57
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs BMW M47
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs BMW M57
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs BMW N57
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.3 MultiJet
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.8 TDCi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 i-CTDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.7 CRDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs TDV6 / SDV6
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs MZR-CD
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs Skyactiv-D
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs OM642
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs OM654
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs OM656
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.6 CDTI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.7 CDTI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 CDTI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.4 HDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 HDi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.9 dCi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0 dCi
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.4 D-4D
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs D5 5 cilindros
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.2 TDI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.4 TDI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 1.9 TDI
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 2.5 TDI R5
- 1.8/2.2 DI-D vs 3.0 TDI V6
With the D4/D5
- D4/D5 vs 1.5 BlueHDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 1.5 dCi
- D4/D5 vs BMW N47
- D4/D5 vs 1.3 Multijet
- D4/D5 vs OM651
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 JTDm Multijet II
- D4/D5 vs BMW B47
- D4/D5 vs BMW B57
- D4/D5 vs BMW M47
- D4/D5 vs BMW M57
- D4/D5 vs BMW N57
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 and 2.0 MultiJet II
- D4/D5 vs 1.9 JTD/Multijet and 2.4 JTD
- D4/D5 vs 2.3 MultiJet
- D4/D5 vs 2.4 JTD / JTDm Multijet
- D4/D5 vs 1.8 TDCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 / 2.4 / 3.2 TDCi (Puma)
- D4/D5 vs 1.5 / 2.0 EcoBlue
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 i-CTDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 / 2.2 i-DTEC
- D4/D5 vs 1.7 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 and 2.2 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.1 and 1.4 CRDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 CRDi (D4EA)
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 TD4 / SD4
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 Ingenium diésel
- D4/D5 vs TDV6 / SDV6
- D4/D5 vs e-Skyactiv D 3.3
- D4/D5 vs MZR-CD
- D4/D5 vs Skyactiv-D
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 CDI (OM640)
- D4/D5 vs OM642
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 CDI (OM646)
- D4/D5 vs OM654
- D4/D5 vs OM656
- D4/D5 vs 2.2/2.5 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.5 dCi YD25
- D4/D5 vs 1.6 CDTI
- D4/D5 vs 1.7 CDTI
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 DTI and 2.2 DTI
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 CDTI
- D4/D5 vs 1.4 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 BlueHDi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 HDi
- D4/D5 vs 1.9 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.0 dCi
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 dCi and 3.0 dCi V6
- D4/D5 vs 2.3 dCi (M9T)
- D4/D5 vs 2.2 MultiJet / BlueHDi (Stellantis)
- D4/D5 vs 1.4 D-4D
- D4/D5 vs 2.0/2.2 D-4D
- D4/D5 vs 2.4 / 2.8 D-4D (GD)
- D4/D5 vs VM Motori 2.8 and 3.0 CRD
- D4/D5 vs D5 5 cilindros
- D4/D5 vs 1.2 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 1.4 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 1.9 TDI
- D4/D5 vs 2.5 TDI R5
- D4/D5 vs 3.0 TDI V6
Compare other engines
Sources
Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.
- Mitsubishi OutlanderWikipedia (inglés) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Mitsubishi OutlanderWikipedia (español) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Mitsubishi ASX – Typische Probleme & KrankheitenGebrauchtwagenberater.de · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Mitsubishi Outlander: bekannte Probleme und MängelGebrauchtwagenberater.de · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Volvo Engine ArchitectureWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Volvo D5: 185 CV para el S60, V70, XC70 y XC90Autopista.es · Motoring press · published July 2005 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo XC60 (2008-2017)Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo V60Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Mitsubishi 4N1 engineWikipedia (inglés) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Mitsubishi ASXWikipedia (inglés) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Mitsubishi ASXWikipedia (francés) · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Volvo XC90Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in Spanish
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo S60Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French
- Fiabilité et pannes Volvo XC60 (2017-)Fiches-auto.fr · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in French